Why bother? A simple
question. But, in trying to answer, the story line gets complicated
because we use language to ask and answer the question.
Language began to
evolve about 100,000 years ago. It made sophisticated thinking
possible and it passed through the generations. Man became the
toolmaker and cultural evolution quickly moved people from foraging
to settled agriculture; from the stone age through the bronze and
iron ages; and from villages to cities and to the creation of empires
with elaborate divisions of labour.
Language evolved. It's
underlying structure involved sentences with subject, verb and
object. And there was a tendency to see patterns and agents (ref
Shermer) that gave rise to an abundance of myths and magic.
Truth is culturally
relative. Different cultures have different truths which people die
defending. But absolute 'truth' is not the issue. From the
evolutionary point of view what matters is that the pattern of
thinking in group A is implanted in more minds in the next
generations than the patterns of group B. Natural selection with
survival of the fittest.
Scientific thinking at
its best does not deal with truth but rather with best working
hypotheses. These are evidence based and groups of them hang together
as a world view or paradigm. Once enough countervailing evidence
accumulates the paradigm shifts.
The recent accumulating
evidence in the fields of neurology, evolutionary psychology,
behavioural economics and mindfulness meditation suggest that a
paradigm shift is happening in our understanding of the structure and
functions of the human mindbrain.
Carl Sagan noted that
we are animated and dynamic stardust. That which was once inanimate
and unconscious evolved as living and conscious beings.
Some of these beings
developed the illusion of themselves as self conscious and invented
cultural forms that reinforced the illusion and justified dying for
the cause (aka resources).
A marginal few sat in
mindfulness and overcame the limitations of language. They thus
became awake to and aware of
the illusory nature of views generally and of an abiding self. Lao
Tzu spoke for the mystical community when he noted that “the
reality that can be described is not the real reality”. There is an
ineffable Oneness in the unconscious which predates language.
In
retirement 'I' practice stillness and mindfulness so that a blissful,
non-egoic state of flow captures attention. In the flow state the
not-I lets the unconscious produce doodles and stories. 'It' is ever
active and very rarely fails to deliver 'stuff'.
No comments:
Post a Comment