Saturday 10 January 2015

unattached to weltanschauung



Outline 150108
This little story was structured using the ‘outline’ feature in MSWord. The main ideas that presently capture my attention were listed, prioritised and sequenced as a series of headings and sub-headings (the default template calls them articles and sections). I then added a few words to explain what is covered in the higher level labels. The basic conclusion is that, in theory at least, I can be unattached to my world view.

Article I.        Weltanschauung (World View)

Everyone has a view of the world which is part hard wired and part absorbed from the cultures in which they grew up and presently inhabit. Various thinkers at various times have described and popularised particular world views. It adds gravitas to use a German label for the concept. Types of world view include religious (Taoism, Hinduism, Buddhism, Christianity, Islam etc), and political/ economic (anarchist, communist, socialist, conservative, capitalist etc)

Section 1.01                Points of view

A person’s Weltanschauung deals with the big picture which is made up of many smaller points of view. These need not always be rationally contingent and rarely are. But, arguably, it is worth the bother of trying to tie the loose ends together as the whole is greater than the sum of its individual parts. Intellectually this can be a rough road to ride (see below).
Another grave German word is Zeitgeist which points to the spirit of the age. Many people in these modern, rational, scientific times still cling zealously to ancient and xenophobic belief systems.
‘Big History’ is built around the idea of a cosmic zoom through the incredibly small to the incredibly large in space and time. ‘It’ began with the Big Bang 13.7 billion years ago and, before too long our sun will go out and it will be all over for life as we know it.
It is said that ‘the truth shall set you free’. But one person’s ‘truth’ is another person’s propaganda. Thus there is need for multi-disciplinary and multi-stakeholder processes

(a)    Holism (Systems theory)

(b)    Zeitgeist

(c)    Big History – http://bighistoryproject.com

(d)    Cosmic Zoom

(e)    Propaganda

Article II.      Multi-stakeholder processes

There is a growing realisation of the need to actively engage the stakeholders if policies, plans and projects are to be effective and self sustaining in the long term. The details of procedure are clearly set out in Minu Hemmati (2002) “Multi-Stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability – beyond deadlock and conflict” (UNEP)
There is also a growing tendency, especially in the academic world, to work in multi-disciplinary teams. Details on how this might be arranged are outlined by E O Wilson (1998) in his book “Consilience – the unity of knowledge”.
If there is to be equity, peace and environmental stewardship in our time then reconciliation must emerge between the rich and powerful and the impoverished and powerless.
Grass roots individuals and organisations must develop resilience if they are to survive the struggle of reining in the rich and powerful. ICT increasingly directs, focuses and nudges future action and reflection by crowds.

Section 2.01                Multi-disciplinary teams

(a)    Consilience

(b)    Reconciliation

(c)    Resilience

Article III.    Mindbrain

The brain is the physical thing and the mind is made up of mainly unconscious thoughts and feelings. Neither stands alone – there are neural correlates behind all thoughts and feelings. The brain changes the mind and the mind changes the brain – what fires together, wires together. I call it the mindbrain.

Section 3.01                Psychology

The mindbrain evolved to help shape our reactions and responses to changes in the external world. We can therefore effectively find food, avoid being eaten, and operate in social situations so as to generate offspring. Modern human beings carry aspects of mindbrain that evolved in our ancestors that include primates, mammals, reptiles and fish. It can be useful thinking in terms of a stone age brain in a computer age world.
There are several branches of psychology but they are all informed by evolutionary thinking. The mindbrain has evolved in response to adaptive challenges. But evolution tinkers and does not sort out the messy bits.
Behavioural and economic psychology are experimental and applied subjects. They seek to study the details of how people actually think. It is now clear that up front self consciousness is not nearly as rational as was earlier thought.
Traditional psychology studied people with mindbrain problems and sought ways of getting them back to normal. Positive psychology studies people with superior mindbrains and seeks ways of helping more people to be more positive and transcendent. (ref Seligman).

(a)    evolutionary

(b)    behavioural

(c)    economic

(d)    positive

Section 3.02                Neurology

Aided by a variety of brain scanning techniques, neurology has rocketed to prominence. It is now apparent that the mindbrain is composed of many interacting modules and that there is a two way interaction between the mind and the brain.
Neural plasticity is much more prominent than was originally supposed and it will most likely lead to new ways of promoting healthy psychological and cultural development.
It might be useful to ban the use of the words consciousness and the unconscious because they carry too much outmoded thinking. The European enlightenment went overboard in promoting the rational self conscious as modern man’s greatest achievement. Behavioural and economic psychology shows that this is nonsense.

(a)    modules

(b)    plasticity

(c)    consciousness v unconsciousness

Section 3.03                Mindfulness

Most people, most of the time, operate on automatic pilot. They are driven by instinct and by intuition and are easy prey for advertising and propaganda. But it is possible to come off automatic pilot by training your mind and acting ‘as if’ you were an observer/ witness to the thoughts, feelings and moods that come and go through your attention centre. Having learned how to do this you can be unattached and at peace. The process can be viewed as a psychology of perception and is called mindfulness.
Mindfulness is the root of Eastern meditation which in the last 2000 years or so has developed a vast and exotic history. A good reference is Henepola Gunaratana (1991) Mindfulness in plain English http://vipassana.com/meditation/mindfulness_in_plain_english.php
Mindfulness in the modern West has been around for about 40 years but has only recently more or less gone viral. Jon Kabat-Zinn developed a Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) programme which ignored the exotic eastern trappings. Look him up in Google – he comes across well on video. An associated good read is Mark Williams and Danny Penman (2011) “Mindfulness – a practical guide to finding peace in a frantic world.”

(a)    Eastern roots

(b)    Western refinements

Section 3.04                Meta-cognition

I was a school teacher of science and biology before becoming an adult learning facilitator. The latter demanded that I should have facilitated my own learning. I did this by turning the wheel of action/ reflection, for at least a year, five times. I also cheated by acquiring a couple of Master degrees – but at least they were after the event studies (a) Agricultural Extension through schools - when I had already done it in three schools, and (b) curriculum development and teacher training – when I had already worked on both in four countries.
On one of the retreats I tackled philosophy and was drawn to existentialism and thus to cultural relativism – the eternal verities evaporated and there was a serious dose of cognitive dissonance. There were too many threads and I could not rationally and reasonably tie them together. The only certainty was doubt.
Then I discovered mindfulness. I realised that ‘making sense’ in the style of the European enlightenment is a futile project. The Weltanschauung is always mind made and is therefore always coloured by the sense maker’s culture and language.
Then, more recently, I discovered the three psychologies mentioned earlier. They have been integrated in a user friendly way by Nobel prize winner Daniel Kahneman (2011) “Thinking, Fast and Slow”.
Most of us most of the time think fast and react quickly based on instinct and intuition which are subject to many kinds of bias. But there is now the possibility of many more of us more often thinking slow and responding thoughtfully in the manner of mindfulness that, by its nature due to evolution is tolerant and peaceful. Opposing Weltanschauungs but with nothing to kill or die for. (Other than them!)

(a)    Cognitive dissonance

(b)    Fast and slow

No comments:

Post a Comment