Friday 25 October 2013

Wednesday 16 October 2013

Expanding horizons


This morning low slung sunlight peeped in the south windows of my cottage. I noticed and noticed the noticing. There was a subtle and short-lived waft of joy. This was rooted in gratitude for having been programmed in such a way that I notice and celebrate those things.

And then there was a thump in the lobby as the mail arrived. It was Lesley Riddoch’s 2013 book “Blossom – what Scotland needs to flourish”. So far I have read only the introduction but it is predictably feisty. She notes the contemporary profusion of parochial xenophobia and the need to surmount it. She also sees the need for the various categories of Scottish people to expand their horizons.

I worked as a curriculum development advisor to the Ministry of Education in Belize in 1988-92. The Social Studies working group was inspired by the thought of helping students to develop expanding horizons. The more progressive teachers felt that this would help students to recognise and counter the imperialism of American media productions which were becoming widespread. The alien TV culture had begun to devour local traditions. I have not been back and cannot therefore say whether that tide was stopped.

I have been concerned with expanding horizons leading to better ways to be human since the 1960s and in the past few years I have blogged about the concept many times. The following set of annotated links covers the main ideas which include the Ken Wilber vision of ‘No Boundaries’

>>>>>

Better ways to be human: “By comparison all things shine. I had little to complain about from a childhood in small, coastal towns in the NE of Scotland in the 1950-60s. From upper working class roots I made it to University where I studied Biology. By the late 1960s I had committed to zero population growth and to finding better ways to be human. I then gravitated towards 'education' and lived and worked for many years in various parts of the tropics. Forty years later I am back in the NE of Scotland as a freelance consultant/ landlord/ recluse and I am still trying to figure better ways to be human.

http://dodclark.blogspot.co.uk/2008/12/better-ways-to-be-human.html 

>>>>>


Insane mystics?: “Are the mystics and sages insane? Because they all tell variations on the same story, don't they? The story of awakening one morning and discovering you are one with the All, in a timeless and eternal and infinite fashion. Yes, maybe they are crazy, these divine fools. Maybe they are mumbling idiots in the face of the Abyss. Maybe they need a nice, understanding therapist. Yes, I'm sure that would help. But then, I wonder.” [Ken Wilber]

http://dodclark.blogspot.co.uk/2009/06/are-mystics-and-sages-insane-because.html

>>>>>

Unexamined: “For a meditator the goal is to focus attention on the breathing and to have it stay there. If mental proliferation kicks in then this is noticed and attention is gently returned to the breath. Again and again. The path is made by walking. Be still and know. Then you are in a better position to examine your life and make it worth living?”

http://dodclark.blogspot.co.uk/2012/07/unexamined.html

>>>>>

Spectrum of consciousness: Ken Wilber (1979, 2001) No Boundary, eastern and western approaches to personal growth. (2 diagrams)

http://dodclark.blogspot.co.uk/2013/02/ken-wilbers-spectrum-of-consciousness.html

>>>>>

renunciation is in our plastic genes: “In western capitalist countries the individuated and selfish Me is the reified centre of attention. But this is unlikely to lead to evolutionary success because humans are social animals who need family and friends to survive.”

http://naesaebad.blogspot.co.uk/2013/03/renunciation-is-in-our-plastic-genes.html

>>>>>

I wish us well as a new nation.

Let the sunshine in!






Monday 14 October 2013

If mindfulness is the answer then what is the question?


Questions

How can we reduce greed, exploitation and zealoutry?

  • How can we reduce the rate of consumption in the rich countries (greed)?
  • How can we reduce the exploitation of workers and the physical environment?
  • How can we reduce religious and cultural zealoutry?

Answers

By changing our minds through mindfulness (It is never too late!)

By making time to sit quietly

  • On a regular basis
  • When feeling agitated
  • Before making decisions (responding mindfully rather than reacting mindlessly)
  • While on your own or in company with others

By letting go of narrow world views and parochial points of view (renunciation).

By mindfully embracing mind expanding thought patterns associated with

  • Big History - forward from the big bang – the big picture
  • consilience between neurology and evolutionary psychology
  • altered states of consciousness, neural plasticity and no boundaries


Thursday 10 October 2013

Mindfulness and the mindbrain


The word ‘mindfulness’ is less exotic and more user friendly than the word ‘meditation’.

But, to understand mindfulness, we need to be clear about (a) what we mean by ‘mind’ and how it is linked to the ‘brain’ and (b) how the two mirror each other in the ‘mindbrain’.

Your mind is a dynamic process that reasons, thinks, feels, wills, perceives, and judges. It also stores memories. From a psychological point of view the mind is the totality of conscious and unconscious mental processes and activities.

Your brain is the organ of thought and feeling and it also regulates bodily activities. It is the control centre of the nervous system. It consists of a soft, convoluted mass of gray and white matter and serves to control and coordinate your mental and physical actions. Different parts of the brain (modules) have different jobs to do.

SO – your brain is an organ, a physical thing, a structure with many subcomponents and modules. Your mind is a process, an abstract thing, a set of functions - again with many subcomponents. But you cannot have one without the other. Every mind function has a corresponding brain structure. And every brain structure has a corresponding mind function. Note – ‘you’ are unconscious of the vast majority of what goes on in your head.

In recent years a variety of brain scanning techniques have been developed. These show that particular parts of the brain light up when you are engaged in particular mental activities. This throws new light on the ancient ‘mind over matter’ problem!


Scanning shows that the brains of expert meditators light up differently from the brains of non meditators. This demonstrates that by taking thought it is possible to change the structure (physical, electrical, and chemical) of your brain. There is neural plasticity that allows for reconfiguring connections and forming new habits. There is the idea that ‘what fires together wires together’. It is never too late to change your mind.

It is not yet common to think or talk about the links between the brain and it’s minds or the mind and its brain based roots. But there are the beginnings of a need for the unifying concept of mindbrain – if only as an aid to mindfulness. (See the various works of Rick Hanson on the neuroscience of the Buddha’s brain).

The essence of mindfulness is to be still (physically and mentally) such that you can be a calm witness to the thoughts and feelings that attract and pass through attention. In time, with practice, this leads to an appreciation of the mess created by the monkey mind intuitively reacting to stimuli from the outside world. But the monkey can be tamed and the illusory nature of the ‘self’ becomes apparent. And then  – ‘No self, no problem’.

Were it not such an ugly word we could have the concept of mindbrainfulness.


Monday 7 October 2013

Stand on two feet


I wear a pedometer and keep a record of the number of steps I take each day. In the last month the daily number of steps has ranged from 308 to 7397 with an average of 1715.

Expert opinion reckons that, for good health, I should take 10,000 steps per day! There is a shortfall. I should walk more.

Today I feel inclined to acknowledge bipedalism.

I am human and I stand and walk on my back pair of limbs (legs and feet). This leaves the front pair of limbs (arms and hands) free to carry things. What kind of things? Tools. It would have begun with hunters and gatherers.

When hunting you need tools for

  • killing and butchering (you need sharpness)
  • carrying the meat back to base camp (poles and string)
  • carving and cooking (knives and fire)

When gathering you need tools for

  • pulling down high branches
  • digging for roots (sharp sticks)
  • containing and carrying the harvest (baskets with handles)


These days we hunt for bargains in supermarket aisles. Then we gather them in baskets or in trolleys for easy movement through the check out and the car park and into the boot of our car

OR – more recently, we can do an online shopping and the man in the van delivers the goods straight into our kitchen.

In olden times there was no option but to use our legs and feet - and fitness followed. In modern times there is the option of being a hugely unhealthy couch slouch with lack lustre limbs. I should walk more.

Sunday 6 October 2013

A Better Place


 
Recent chats inspired me to pull together some thoughts on how I might help to make the world a better place. The short answer is to ‘promote mindfulness’. A slightly longer answer is presented in what follows with lots of footnotes to help with digging deeper. 

[Note I cannot get the footnotes to jump in this blog. A doc version of the article is available HERE]

Facilitation of the process might revolve around my acronym of STEEPLES – Social, Technological, Environmental, Economic, Political, Legal, Ethical and Spiritual. I have a website[1] that expands on a way of thinking which could be seen as systematic, holistic, interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder[2]. The new word for that way of working is consilience[3]. My main focus these days is with the ethical and spiritual dimensions as these generate the values that ultimately govern people’s decisions and behaviour

During these last few years I have been trying to better understand my ‘spiritual’ journey[4]. The word ‘spiritual’ has so many meanings that I do not like to use it. I prefer to focus on the means of changing what people value and what they consider to be their purpose for being on the planet. I have a blog dedicated to the idea of Changing Minds[5].  Note that Howard Gardner’s otherwise excellent book on ‘Changing Minds[6]’ does not address the notion of mindfulness.

This issue could easily become an academic and intellectual debate. People hold on to their familiar certainties and habits. There is need of a paradigm shift[7]. What we need is a system that allows people’s egos to “go to pieces without falling apart”[8] ie to accept the self and its associated world view as an ongoing process rather than as an abiding reality.

And there is such a system – they call it “mindfulness”. As a means of cleansing the doors of perception[9] it has been around in the east for almost 3000 years. S.N. Goenka[10] who died recently at the age of 90 did much to introduce the practice to people from all walks of life.


Mindfulness is now being culturally transformed in the west as variations on the theme of Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR[11]). The technique was developed by Jon Kabat-Zinn[12] in the 1970s and it is now used in schools, prisons, the army and as a potent component of therapeutic systems in mainstream medicine.

As a technique it is very simple. Kabat-Zinn reckons that “Mindfulness means paying attention in a particular way; on purpose, in the present moment, and non judgmentally.” Dogen Zenji, a 13th century monk, reckoned that all that is needed is to ‘just sit’ and ‘drop off body and mind’.

But there are at least two other emergent lines of thought. Abraham Maslow’s hierarchy of needs pointed to the notion of Self-Actualization and Self-Transcendence[13]. This led to the notion of a positive psychology that focuses on the supernormal rather than the subnormal. This led to the ideas of flow (Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi), flourishing (Martin Seligman) and the art and craft of happiness[14].

Another potent line of thought links the work of neuroscientists[15] with that of evolutionary psychologists[16]. The human mindbrain is modular. Different modules evolved at different times in the long history of life on planet earth. And in humans the hard wiring of the nervous system is relatively less than in other animals. We react and respond as a result of our genetic nature being influencd by our cultural nurture[17]. But still there is ‘fast’ and ‘slow’ thinking[18].


By taking time to notice how and why we think, feel and talk we inevitably develop compassion for ourselves and for others within our ingroup and even for those in the outgroup[19]. There is the challenge of working towards a bigger us. Ken Wilber[20] has set the demanding vision of 'No boundary'. We all have boundaries but, by taking thought, we can reset them in a way that allows us to have a wider and deeper sense of belonging.

SO – by gathering together old and new ideas about mindfulness, and by making them freely available in a user friendly package, I can help to make the word a better place.




[3] Edward O Wilson (1998) Consilience – The Unity Of Knowledge
[6] Howard Gardner (2004) Changing Minds – the art and science of changing our own and other people’s minds
[8] Mark Epstein (1998) Going to pieces without falling apart – a Buddhist perspective on wholeness
[9] Aldous Huxley(1954) The Doors of Perception
[14] Jonathan Haidt (2006) The happiness hypothesis – putting ancient wisdom and philosophy to the test of modern science. AND Richard Layard (2011) Happiness - lessons from a new science
[15] Richard Davidson is the most notable neurologist observing the brains of meditators
[16] Eg  John Tooby and Leda Cosmides
[17] Nature/nurture debate options -
[18] Daniel Kahneman (2011) Thinking fast and slow
[19] Rick Hanson (2009) Buddha’s Brain – the practical neuroscience of happiness, love and wisdom

Wednesday 2 October 2013

Eight components of flow




Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi
Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi developed the idea of "flow" in detail that went beyond simple characterizations of enjoyment or job satisfaction. "Flow" was not just a feeling of well-being, but had eight separate components. 

1) it is the result of a challenging task
2) the person experiencing "flow" becomes part of the task rather than standing outside it
3) it is involved with the pursuit of definite goals
4) it depends on immediate feedback
5) it requires a high level of concentration
6) it gives the user a sense of control without a striving for control, something Csikszentmihalyi called the paradox of control.
7) a sense of self disappears.
8) the sense of time is altered. 

Various parts of this scheme had shown up in other classifications of psychological states, but Csikszentmihalyi's combination of them was unique. "Flow" was not the same as fun, or as joy. It did not depend, as did Maslow's idea of self-actualization, on the meeting of a basic need for security, and indeed it sometimes arose in highly negative situations.