The pattern of thoughts, feelings and moods (TFM) has
changed. There has been a shift in content from evolutionary psychology and
brain science towards music and sound engineering. Is this a good thing – will
it make me better?
Music includes tunes and songs that I have written in times
past, and a collection of pieces from Paulina Honig who also plays whistle and
flute. John Rennie provides vocals, guitar and bass. Rod Summers provides
backing vocals. Jim Paterson provides trombone. I provide some simple wall of
sound using voices from the keyboard: problems with my voice and hands stop me performing
more actively.
Since the 60s I have composed 66 songs. I reckon that 38 of
them are worth developing. 17 are already online with arrangements largely
through an early version (6) of Band-in-a-Box. The target is to make ‘real’
versions of the 38 songs.
The sound engineering presents several steep learning curves
which often give rise to dis-ease due to my making unjustified assumptions
about what ‘should’ be the case. Sometimes I try reading the manual or watching
youtube videos but this rarely helps.
Problematic hardware includes a Zoom R16 multi-purpose
recorder, an AKAI MPK mini keyboard and pad controller, and a USB microphone.
Problematic software includes Cubase LE8 and Band-in-a-Box 2017.
I have been spending a lot of time footering with the music
stuff. The technology and the software have evolved enormously since the
Lesotho days. The new stuff is less self-evident and user-friendly and that
annoys me.
But I have got better at noticing when short term feelings
and longer term moods begin to capture attention. They can therefore be
replaced by occupying attention with something else. For example – domestic chores, doodles, revision
of text and talks by cutting edge thinkers, and focus on one of the various
types of meditation.
These attention grabbers are most effective when they are
non-egoic. It follows the notion, “no-self no problem’’. The calm, unflappable
state is worth cultivating. But there is the linguistic paradox – what is the
nature of the self that knows about the no-self? The Tao Teh Ching has the guts
of the issue –
“The reality that can be described is not the real reality.”
Thus
“He who knows does not speak”
And
“He who speaks does not know”
But, it follows, that there is an indescribable reality
which can nonetheless be intuited and known but not without training the
mindbrain including the unconscious.
So my ongoing awareness of the TFMs that occupy the
attention centre might be seen as a robust means of changing my mindbrain for
the better.
Better?
No comments:
Post a Comment