When the environment changes there is a physical and
cognitive reaction in the unconscious. After the reaction ‘reason’ is used to
justify it in the self-conscious.
Then we are choosy about the ‘evidence’ that is available. We
accept what agrees with our reaction and reject what disagrees. This is confirmation
bias.
Experimental evidence in support of this pattern of thinking
comes from recent social psychology and moral philosophy.
The European Enlightenment in the 17-18th century
reified reason and put the unconscious on the back burner. But there is no need
to polarise the topic. Self-consciousness will have its uses. Perhaps in
helping to shape slower and more thoughtful responses.
Note that ‘truth’ is not an issue. Fast pragmatism rules
when the issue is snakes, impetuous chiefs or war like neighbours.
In my retirement there is rarely a rush. The intention is to
shut down the busy self-conscious and leave the unconscious in control. The
mind has a mind of its own. Non-egoic flow. And the cunning conundrum – which ‘I’
is or should be in charge?
The game plan - feel first and allow the emergence of
motivation and intention.
No comments:
Post a Comment