Many new ideas are emerging about how and why the brain works. The ideas come mainly from neuroscience and various branches of psychology.
A key idea is that the brain has to ‘make sense’ of a huge amount
of information coming in through the sense organs. [Note: there are more than 5
sense organs, and they sample limited ranges of stimuli eg the very small, visible
range of the electro magnetic spectrum.]
There are changes to thinking about rationality and
consciousness. The pattern is illustrated in the following matrix:
Location of thinking/feeling
|
|||
Conscious
|
Unconscious
|
||
Type of thinking/feeling
|
Rational
|
1
|
3
|
Irrational (emotive)
|
2
|
4
|
In the West there was the Renaissance, the Reformation, and
the Enlightenment. These paved the way for the high value put on individualised,
conscious rationality (1) which was understood as the ‘scientific’ mode of
thinking.
Also in the West there was Sigmund Freud whose thinking was influential
in its time but is now seen as flawed. The idea was that the wild, unconscious id
(4) occupied the main parts of the brain and swamped the civilised, rational
ego (1).
Modern thinking suggests that the majority of the brain functions
are managed by the unconscious (3&4) and that the role of the rational and
irrational conscious (1&2) is quite limited. The two parts of the brain are
concerned not with ‘truth’ but rather with empirical effectiveness. The heavy
thinking is managed by the unconscious and is passed to the conscious after the
fact. This raises the issue of the function of self-consciousness – the I, me
and mine conundrum.
The unconscious churns sensory inputs and relates them to
more or less matching materials from memory banks so as to generate fast reactions
and slower responses. This is an enormous and forever ongoing process. It is
the work of the default mind – maybe!
No comments:
Post a Comment