Barry Boyce believes
that “Our minds are … basically sound and good.” But what does
that mean? What are minds for? We can consider this through the lens
of evolutionary psychology. Our minds sit between stimuli and
responses.
stimulus --- mind ---
response
We are social animals
whose minds respond to social stimuli. Some of these responses are
hard wired as reflexes and instincts and are the source of our
intuitions, biases, schema, and rules of thumb. Some of the responses
are learned during our cultural programming, education and
brainwashing. Consciously and unconsciously we are conditioned by
nature and nurture. But surely what was conditioned can be
reconditioned.
Being social we are
neurologically hard wired to conceptualise in terms of 'me', 'us' and
'them'.
When the concepts of I,
me, mine, ego, and self are active, a person's behaviour may be
self-ish or self-less.
When being selfless a
person supports an expanding horizon of 'us' which includes parents,
siblings, family, friends, community, group and tribe. There are
intra group rules related to division of labour and power. Evolution
favours those groups that deal effectively with social interaction.
When being selfish,
'us' competes with 'them' for resources. There are different rules
for interacting in inter group conflicts which often have a
territorial base. Emigration, murder and genocide have been common
features of human evolution.
The poet Alfred
Tennyson gave us the image of, “Nature red in tooth and claw.”
Evolution has created animal bodies adapted to eating plants only,
eating other animals only, or eating both. Human teeth and guts are
adapted for eating both and we spent most of our ancestral time
hunting and killing to complement the plant based section of our
diet. But the only constant thing is change. And history need not be
destiny.
SO? When the champions
of modern mindfulness aspire to be vegetarians they are going against
their evolved nature. Is this wise?
When people aspire to a
bloodless and nicey nicey world as a sound and good thing they are
not dealing with the way things truly are as yet.
BUT, on the positive
side, there is neural plasticity. Even old people can change their
mind. Even murderous meat eaters can expand their horizons to include
as part of 'us' all of humanity, all living things and even the
non-living environment. (ref Wilber's 'No Boundaries)
All human brains are
capable of mindfulness. People have embraced it for thousands of
years and it is now vigorously spreading through modern western
culture. Unlike the other animals, humanity thinks and the thoughts
can be captured, if still imperfectly, in spoken and written words.
SO I can theorise
possible futures where there is a compassionate container for 'us'
with prospering horizons
No comments:
Post a Comment