Saturday, 30 January 2016

updated lessons

If I was still a biology teacher in the South Sudan I might have to update several lesson plans – especially about irritability.

Aha - I have just reviewed the Textbook (169 pp) and the Teacher's Guide (152 pp) that I wrote in the early 80s and printed in 1985 – 30 years ago. 

The section about tropisms and taxes in plants is still OK as is the section about single celled organisms. In fact there is very little that is wrong and the scope of topics touched upon is quite impressive: they include development biology, cephalisation, and animal behaviour.

Some relevant blogposts:




Friday, 29 January 2016

POINTER – Rick Hanson

///////////
POINTER to web sites that I find useful
//////////

I endorse Rick Hanson as a user friendly purveyor of evolutionary psychology and neuroscience and of how these link to mindfulness. At first I reckoned he was a bit of a middle class, California happy clappy type but this impression wore off and I think of him now as a gifted writer and educator. A good bloke. He has probably influenced my present line of thinking more than I realise.

http://naesaebad.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/rick-hanson.html


////////// - some quick links    

 

Tuesday, 26 January 2016

weaving together

Recent authors have driven my thought trains along tracks which weave together. The weaving is increasingly multidisciplinary. E O Wilson named the phenomenon – consilience. The idea is that when flaky, cutting edge thinkers from different disciplines agree with each other then we may be on to something holistic.

I have been noticing developments in neurology for almost fifty years. The mind and the brain are modular and there are neural correlates of consciousness (NCC). Neural plasticity is now recognised – what fires together wires together. The brains of experienced meditators are different from ordinary punter's. The mind can change the brain can change the mind so I call it the mindbrain - and 90% of its activity is unconscious.

Evolutionary psychology snuck up on me. The idea is that the mindbrain modules evolved as adaptations in the same way as hearts, muscles and guts. We now get bye with a Stone Age mindbrain in a computer age culture. There are many modules hard wired into the ancestral parts of the mindbrain but in modern humans there is plenty scope for novelty in the newer cortex which deals with language and executive functions. It is never too late to change a mindbrain.

Daniel Kahneman wrote about “Thinking, fast and slow”. The fast stuff is rooted in hardwiring which uses pragmatic rather than true intuitions, schemas, biases (eg negativity and confirmation) reflexes and instincts. He demonstrated that we rarely think rationally but rather there is an ongoing unconscious churn comparing new inputs with memories and thus generating reactions to stimuli. Kahneman called his work behavioural economics and won a Nobel prize.

Richard Nisbett developed social psychology which involves detailed observation of verbal and non-verbal communication. Matthew D Lieberman invented Social Cognitive Neuroscience which he describes in “Social: Why our brains are wired to connect.” The detailed implications of man being a social animal both by nature and by nurture are being worked out.

The neuroplasticity thought train links easily to the flourishing topic of mindfulness aimed at changing minds so as to make the world a better place. We are increasingly conscious of our consciousness with or without the exotic eastern thought trains. By just sitting and dropping off body and mind we can appreciate the holistic oneness. This follows from the work of Jon Kabat-Zinn on mindfulness based stress reduction (MBSR). Being free of eastern exotica the approach is sometimes called Buddhism lite but anyway it is now a runaway thought train.

We used to study the thinking and feeling of individuals. Now we study the social dynamics of in-groups. I have not seen much written about out-group interactions. A case can be made for the peaceful and pretty in-group systems. Something else might be said about the war-like and ugly out-group systems of rape, pillage and genocide.

Monday, 25 January 2016

POINTER - BigHistory

///////////
POINTER to web sites that I find useful
//////////

"Journey through nearly 14 billion years of history in this self-guided, six-hour version of Big History. You'll find every chapter full of great activities to keep you entertained and test your learning."

POINTER - Big think

///////////
POINTER to web sites that I find useful
//////////

"Every idea on Big Think comes from (it's) ever-growing network of 2,000 Big Think fellows and guest speakers, who comprise the top thinkers and doers from around the globe.

(Their) editorial team regularly sources ideas from these experts, asking them about the most important ideas in their respective fields.

(Their) editors then sift through the submitted ideas and determine which qualify to appear on Big Think, subjecting each to (their) simple, three-pronged standard geared to your interests:

a) significance — how will this idea change the world and impact your life?
b) relevance — what groups and individuals does this idea most affect?
c) application — how can this idea change the way you think or act?"

Some of my favorite authors:


Friday, 22 January 2016

POINTER - David Eagleman

There are three reasons for flagging David Eagleman -  neuroscience and science populariser:

[1] - “The Brain with David Eagleman” - 6 part programme for the BBC


[2] – he is a great communicator (speaking and writing) about new thinking related to neuroscience


[3] - David Eagleman on Possibilianism https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lS0b4QCpFGc


Wednesday, 20 January 2016

making it up

Getting caught up in our sense impressions is getting caught up in judgement about them, getting caught in the never ending matrix of comparisons and desire and looking for completion in the ever unfolding relative world.

That is the very cause of suffering, trying to be complete in what by nature is incomplete and constantly changing.

How can we find satisfaction in things that are constantly ending? ...

So who is the deceiver that tricks us? is it the Buddhist demon Mara? is it the temptations of the Christian Devil or is it the Hindu idea of the great trickster Maya ? Well they could all be symbols of what seems to be just the limited apparatus of the human mechanism.

We are not designed to witness the totality of reality, it’s just too enormous, our brains are designed to filter out most of reality so what is left is the bare essentials to survive in our limited dimension. It’s ourselves that conjure up illusory appearances with our own minds and then believe them. Or put more crudely people tend to make shit up and then believe it to be true.

people tend to make shit up and then believe it to be true

http://www.thewayofmeditation.com.au/blog/how-to-be-a-master-of-the-cosmic-illusion

Monday, 18 January 2016

No suffering, no prospering

This story had begun before I realised that I had told it before - many times. [Ref to compilation] But I was heading for a different ending that would say something about (a) the less than perfect human nature as it presently exists in the mindbrains of suffering humanity (b) the paradigm shifting potential of neuroscience and evolutionary psychology, and (c) the possibility of enabling an improved and peace promoting worldview suited to these modern times.

Suffering comes in a variety of flavours – fear, greed, jealously, lust, anxiety, panic, stress etc and also, in severe forms, as neuroses and psychoses. These are not 'comfortable' but they keep us alert to potentially dangerous changes in the physical and socio-cultural environments. The human brain has a negativity bias.

Suffering was a key concept in the teaching of the Buddha for whom the four noble truths were that:
  1. in life there is suffering.
  2. the cause of suffering is craving (for more good stuff and less bad stuff).
  3. we can put an end to craving and thus to suffering.
  4. to end craving we must follow the 8-fold path and thus change our minds.

OK - in life there is suffering - but the human species is prospering anyway. We can hypothesise that it is because we suffer that we prosper. No suffering, no prospering. No pain no gain.

In the brains of most species unconscious intuitions, reflexes and instincts are enough to meet their needs. They are hard wired in detail by nature and there is not much need of nurture. (Ref xxx)

The human brain has evolved, amongst other things, to find food, avoid predators, and be sociable as part of a group of Stone Age foragers in the African savannah. That pattern of living began about three million years ago and ticked over nicely such that the species expanded out of Africa with a very simple toolkit. Language first appeared 100,00 years ago and it caused a paradigm shift in terms of collective learning about our physical and socio-cultural environments. The balance began to swing in favour of nurture as a powerful force for shaping and changing minds.

Foraging gave way to settled agriculture about 4500 years ago. Human groups got bigger and division of labour took off. There was plenty variety for evolution to work with – especially for group selection. It gave rise to myths and magic rooted in cause and effect, seeing patterns, and supposing agencies.

2500 years ago there was an Axial Age when there was rapid growth in thinking about thinking. Topics such as the meta-physical, super-natural, spiritual, and mystical led to the development of what we now call the major world religions.

2,500 years later two new disciplines throw a fresh light on what is involved in changing minds.

First, neuroscience. There are Neural Correlates of Consciousness (NCC) - whatever appears in the mind is rooted in physical changes in the brain and these can be objectively measured in brain scans. And there is neuroplasticity – by taking thought the mind can change the brain and vice versa.

Second, evolutionary psychology - with social psychology and behavioural economics. The vertebrate brain evolved from fish to philosopher (Homer Smith.) Evolution tinkers so most of its products are functional but scruffy. And the vast majority of actions are in the unconscious.

The classic meditators did not have the understandings of neuroscience and evolutionary psychology but they had insights into counter-intuitive states of the human mindbrain. By sittting still and noting what the mindbrain got up to they realised that reality is mind made. Lao Tzu the father of Taoism reckoned that “the reality that can be described is not the real reality. It followed that “those who speak do not know” and more profoundly that “those who know do not speak”.

From ancient times there have been remarkable individuals who have subjectively appreciated a Oneness. Holistic ecologists given to systems theory know about inter connectedness, Thich Nhat Hahn talks of interbeing. Biologists appreciate biogeochemical cycles and the life stages of a wide variety of parasites.

Evolution operates on three levels – cosmic, biological and cultural. These lay the foundations for each other and there is ongoing feedback between them. For example human cultural evolution has contributed to global warming. There has been no intelligent designer until recently in the newer
stages of cultural evolution. Human beings are not only conscious, they are potentially capable of being conscious of their consciousness and thus, by default, of the roles played by the unconscious.

1] being conscious
2] being conscious of consciousness
3] being self-conscious
4] being subjectively conscious of unconsciousness
5] being objectively conscious of unconsciousness

1] react automatically to changes in the environment eg withdraw your hand when it is too close to fire
2] not only withdraw your hand but also know that you have done so. The brain gets the message after the reaction has taken place
3] when there is 'self' there is 'other' in in-group and out-group situations. The self concept is a useful illusion in terms of politics but it causes all manner of psycho-social problems. Many people reckon that their mind has a mind of its own.
4] meditators subjectively realise that they have a monkey mind which operates like a zombie on autopilot. When sitting quietly and letting the unconscious run its course they reckon that the transcendent Oneness is essentially beneficient and parent like.
5] Neuroscientists are now busy cataloguing the NCC of the changes in the brains of meditators. There is now enough evolved vocabulary to facilitate collective learning on the vast divisions of labour. The innate goodness of the transcendent Oneness is no longer supported as a supernatural, explanatory device. Good and bad are ongoing cultural constructions hard wired in terms of nature's framework upon which nurture's cultural details are grafted.

Three ending points: [1] Human nature is not all nicey nicey, [2] multidisciplinary consilience brings many different ideas together, and, [3] we now have better ideas about how to tame and train our minds.

Sunday, 10 January 2016

controlling the zombie monkey


When I make time to sit 'I' soon realise the presence of the hyperactive monkey mind and the zombie on autopilot. These give the impression that the mind has a mind of its own and that 'I' am not in control of my thoughts, feelings and moods.

Three questions arise: (a) who or what is in control of what occupies attention?
(b) can the process be controlled?; and (c) who would control it and for what purpose?

The contents of a particular mindbrain will have been sourced from nature, nurture and serendipity. Millions of years of evolution have resulted in a mindbrain that is genetically hardwired to suit us for a life of foraging in groups of 100 in the African savanna. We are born with a multitude of inbuilt instincts, reflexes, intuitions, biases etc.

But the hard wiring needs fine tuning to make it relevant to particular physical and cultural environments. For example, we are hard wired to learn a language but the particular language depends on our cultural nurturing. The process of nurturing is a complex source of contention. It can be thought of as brainwashing, programming, indoctrination, enculturation, training, education, or enlightenment. Sources of enculturation vary with age and include parents, siblings, extended family members, friends, communities, teachers, co-workers, bosses, the media (and now social networks) and political and religious leaders.

Serendipity (chance) plays a major role in the details of which sources of nurturing are most pertinent in shaping the minds of individuals. For example, you cannot choose your parents and they may not be fully functional. An individual will be shaped by their culture in general and by their various subcultures in particular.

For example I have been got at by the Presbyterian work ethic and by the belief that 'progress' is possible. This has led me to believe that there are better ways to be human and that these can be achieved by changing minds – my own mind and the minds of others.

When I make time to sit the evanescence of most thoughts, feelings and moods (TFM) is obvious as is their slight and questionable relevance to the TFM that went immediately before. I am thus inclined to suppose a process of unconscious churn. There are two types of input – (a) a continuous stream of signals from the sense organs and (b) a stream of items from memory. These are churned to enable the creation of stories and judgements about the nature of the signals from the sensory organs. Some of these stories are fed to the self-conscious almost as an after thought.

Evolution does not have a hierarchy to plan in advance. Instead it churns and footers so as to link the present to the past and the possible future. The functions of specialist nodules are integrated to quickly generate stories which form the basis of reactions and responses to immediate stimuli. Note that what matters is effectiveness rather than truth. Humanity came a long way while believing that the world is flat; heavier than air machines could not fly; and a woman's place is in the kitchen with a baby strapped to her back.

When I make time to sit I learn to expect the unexpected because the only certainty is doubt, and the only constant thing is change – remaining uncertain is therefore a good thing as it (a)
prevents us from living like zombies on autopilot and (b) it ensures that the monkey mind remains unrestrained, unpredictable and thus well able to adapt to changes in the physical and social environment.

I can now answer the three questions that were asked earlier:

(a) who or what is in control of what occupies attention?

An integrated network of specialist nodules in the brain generates stories which shape reactions and responses to external stimuli.

(b) can the process be controlled?

The process is presently controlled by the unconscious. A small dose of its TFM are shared with the self conscious whose cogitations are fed back to the unconscious churn. This can create the illusion of a self-conscious ego with a free will being rational and in charge. However, the experiments of social psychologists demonstrate that it is not so.

(c) who would control it and for what purpose?

The unconscious mind manages a mind boggling number of tasks with their stories. A very small number of these are shared with the self-conscious. But there is neural plasticity. By taking thought an individual can change their brain. We can all tame it and train it and thus realise the potential for peace that rests within us all.

'By taking thought' rooted in mindfulness individuals can be more at peace with themselves and thus with their environment. A mind that is tamed and trained can be a force for 'good' in the world. But this is not inevitable. Mindfulness training is now a key part of military training in the US.
It helps in the creation of peace-able killers who do not suffer from PTSD.

When I make time to sit I have some experience of a changing mind – it is powerful stuff. The monkey mind is less restless and the zombie runs on an upgraded program. I will finish with a quote from Thich Nhat Hahn:

dont just do something,
sit there

Thursday, 7 January 2016

Distractive footering

I am awake for 16 hours every day. The unconscious occupies most of that time with thoughts, feeling and moods (TFM). Some of the TFMs are channelled to the attention centre of the self conscious. The items of TFM leap about giving the notion of a monkey mind. There is also the notion of a zombie on autopilot. Your mind has a mind of its own but the details are programmed by your culture.

It is presently 15:15pm and I have been on the go since 08:30 am. I did not have a to do list determining at one moment what I would be doing at a later moment. But I have been busy with various more or less formal projects which are a mix of domestic chores (eg clean the kitchen) and technological challenges (eg set up machines for multitrack recording).

A list of today's other mini-project ideas that have flashed through the attention centre would be very long. The particular thoughts were influenced by feelings and moods which were a mix of negative, neutral and positive. A churning mix of macro and micro – the monkey mind.

But one of the thoughts caught attention. “The devil finds work for idle hands to do.” I had been footering - and this brought feelings of shame and guilt. There was thus the urge to enter a state of mindfulness. So I sat in a comfy chair, closed my eyes and focussed attention on the breath. The negative TFM were thus replaced by more positive ones. For example the title for this story was sent by my muse who has also been principle author. 'I' have been in 'flow'.

We are are possibly hard wired for distractive footering. The process helped to monitor the inputs from the sense organs and thus to be fast to notice and react when there is a lion in the vicinity. Woe to the absent minded philosopher and the mindful meditator: they would be relatively slow to respond and would thus be lion fodder.

But there are no lions in Portsoy. It is a safe place for philosophers to be in flow and for meditators to heed their muses. Students of the Way can then take their zombie off autopilot and their monkey mind can be set at peace. In a couple of weeks I will be 67; there is not much time left to heed the Bhudda's dying words - “Work out your salvation with diligence”.

Here is a start - I can aim to avoid distractive footering for more of my 16 waking hours each day.

Sunday, 3 January 2016

Two types of mindfulness

Concentrating - stay focussed on a particular eg breath, mantra, walking etc. When you notice that the mind has wandered, bring it back.

Witnessing – while sitting quietly note what passes through mind – thoughts, feelings, moods. What comes also goes. Just watch. Let it be.

There is a detached space between stimulus and response. Cultivate it.

Saturday, 2 January 2016

confabulating restraint

The mindbrain was becoming stressed while dealing with the technology. It was time to change my mind. 

First - read some dharma talk from Mark Epstein. Second - brainstorm 14 words, list them alphabetically, then use them to confabulate sentences.

brooding
contentment
desire
drive
motivation
need
peace
release
renunciant
retreat
sacrifice
urge
want
witness

“Brooding can be replaced by contentment when desire activates a drive and motivation to recognise latent needs. Peace comes as a result of release which is most effectively achieved while being a renunciant in retreat. Sacrifice gradually wears away the urges. The ephemeral nature of wants and needs is noted by the witness. Restraint is tough in the beginning but it gets easier, almost inevitable, with practice.”