Sunday, 8 May 2016

The indivisible oneness



Thoughts, feelings and moods (TFM) appear to my conscious mind which is deeply rooted in an evolutionary stream that stretches back to the big bang.

The TFMs come from the unconscious churn which draws meaning from inputs arriving at my sense organs (eg eyes, ears etc). I ‘understand’ the inputs by matching them with memories of similar TFMs in the past.

My TFMs are created by nature, nurture and serendipity (NNS). Nature has hard wired (a) the range of stimuli to which the sense organs can respond (eg visible light within the electromagnetic spectrum) and (b) a range of high level frameworks which can be filled out during the nurturing process. ( eg my nature creates the ability to learn a language but the details of the particular language are provided by nurture.) Nurturing involves never-ending womb to tomb education and enculturation. Serendipity is another name for chance. (eg droughts and floods can give rise to TFMs about gruesome gods and angry ancestors.)

We can summarise the thought train with a two-way formula:

NNS <==> TFM

The NNS to which I have been encultured presumably gives rise to unconscious TFM on an ongoing basis: and some of the TFMs are passed into conscious attention where they are ‘thought about’ and then channelled back into the unconscious where they influence the nurturing process. It is an ongoing two-way process;

Cause <==> Effect]

NNS is the cause of such TFMs as may appear in the self-conscious. The new born baby has built in nature which acts as a foundation upon which to build nurture and serendipity. But what is the cause of the Nature? The answer is evolution which results from natural selection acting on the variations that are generated during sexual reproduction: and this allows for the survival of the fittest. But the ‘fittest’ what?

There are three phases of evolution – Cosmic, Biological and Cultural. Biological evolution deals with individuals while cultural evolution deals with groups communicating with each other using language

Reality changes from one, mind-made thought moment to the next. The thoughts (TFMs) exist in some individual minds more than others and their popularity is constantly changing. Minds change to harmonise with ongoing changes in the internal and external environments. We might thus be led to ask “What’s it all about, Alfie?

We can deal with particular topics using whole systems theory. This involves moving from sub atomic particles through cells, from individuals through cultures, from ecosystems through the planet, from solar systems through the cosmos and so on till the big bang.

Different Alfies will answer the question differently depending on their pattern of enculturation and specialist know how. For example, those who, like me, have been got at by academia include thoughts of the:

Atomic physicist, biochemist, palaeontologist, astronomer, archaeologist, psychologist, sociologist, anthropologist, economist, politician, ecologist, philosopher, neurologist, cleric, historian, journalist, novelist, poet.

There is the idea of nesting. Thus a ‘thing’ is made up of smaller things and is at the same time a part of something bigger. And, as a general rule, a whole, at whatever level, is greater than the sum of its individual parts.

A thing (eg me), is made up of sub-things (eg organs and tissues) and is part of a super thing (eg cultures and technologies).

Sub-thing ↔ thing ↔ super-thing

Carl Sagan reckoned that we are stardust that evolved and created consciousness (ie the ability to be aware of and respond to changes in the external environment,). And then consciousness evolved and created the concept of an ego or self-consciousness. The stardust congeals into droplets of self-centred ego that are successful in turning increasing amounts of the substance of planet earth into human beings.

Unfortunately this ego-centric and anthropocentric point of view is leading to the destruction of the planet as we know it.

Fortunately ego is mind-made and has no abiding reality: and, over the last 4000 years or so, there have been individuals who have (a) intuited the non-abiding nature of the ‘self’ and (b) transcended it.

There are two forms of transcendence. One is ‘flow’ and is known amongst athletes as being in the zone and by improvising musicians as being in the groove. These transcendent frames of mind are non-egoic. Self consciousness melts away and the unconscious is in control. The mind has a mind of its own.

The other form of transcendence involves mindfulness. This is rooted in Eastern traditions and comes in a variety of forms. One of the main ideas involves watching the breath such that you become still and know the peace that passes all understanding.

SO – “What’s it all about Alfie?”
  • The ordinary mindbrain can be transcended
  • It is never too late to change your mind
  • Nothing comes from nothing
  • The indivisible Oneness

Monday, 25 April 2016

The clothing of language




  • Plato reckoned that information can be true when it is rationally related to the real reality that is out there (ie to the Platonic ideals).
  • Lao Tzu reckoned that the reality that can be described is not the real reality. This is because language cannot do justice to reality.
  • Mystics reckon that reality can be intuited when the mind is in a meditative state of non-egoic flow (ie when in a transcendental condition).


In ‘fact’ all beliefs, feelings and intuitions are mind made: and they are developed and sustained using language in a variety of sociocultural settings.

Culture is like mental clothing woven in words – the new born baby learns to wear it. It provides the nurture that complements their nature. But in this case there is no going back. We are social animals that cannot return to being culturally naked.

BUT there is globalisation - and cultures collide. There are many ways to be human. And many more  people are becoming acquaint with a range of options in the nature v nurture debate.

Intellectually honest people can no longer be zealous xenophobes. There may still be them and us but there are expanding horizons which can lead to a state of ‘no boundaries’ (ref Ken Wilber). There is no demonic propaganda but rather thoughtful discussion leading to win/win agreements among like minded souls.

SO – the emperor of global thought (ie public opinion) is fashion conscious and has a wardrobe full of cultural clothes which more or less suitably address the human condition as expressed in a planetary game of Chinese whispers replete with cumulative errors.

BUT we now have Chinese whispers on the internet. There is thus an irrevocable, bottom up groundswell of a new hegemony where ‘truth’ is spoken to elegant power.

AHA – a meme – ‘speaking truth to debunk the hegemony of elegant but elitist power’.  

Monday, 18 April 2016

wasting time



To avoid wasting time I should do something. But some things are more worthy than others. And there are both intra and intercultural examples.

I spend a lot of time thinking rather than doing. This is an old routine. As a teacher I would do a literature search, then design and present a lesson plan. And the old habits are still with me in retirement.

But these days things are done differently. Students have easy access to information via the internet so finding content is not a problem. But on popular topics the student can be overwhelmed by the amount and reliability of data.

In my youth and amongst my ancestors there was what E H Waddington called COWDUNG (conventional wisdom of the dominant groups). But modern freethinkers embrace cultural pluralism which deals not with truth but rather with the best working hypothesis given the evidence presently available.

Intellectually honest modern people accept uncertainty and doubt. Their minds are not closed. They are unlikely to be zealots. If such people were to be the power brokers we might see an end to war.